mp3 search For
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 0..9

Van Halen - For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge

Van Halen : For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge
Artist: Van Halen
Album: For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge
Year: Year: Year: 1991
Genre(s): Pop: Pop-Rock
Ringtone download:
For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge



N Track Title Track Length Preview Download Track
1 Poundcake 5:22 PreviewDownload ringtone Download
2 Judgement Day 4:39 PreviewDownload ringtone Download
3 Spanked 4:53 PreviewDownload ringtone Download
4 Runaround 4:21 PreviewDownload ringtone Download
5 Pleasure Dome 6:58 PreviewDownload ringtone Download
6 In 'N' Out 6:05 PreviewDownload ringtone Download
7 Man On A Mission 5:04 PreviewDownload ringtone Download
8 The Dream Is Over 4:00 PreviewDownload ringtone Download
9 Right Now 5:22 PreviewDownload ringtone Download
10 316 1:30 PreviewDownload ringtone Download
11 Top Of The World 3:55 PreviewDownload ringtone Download
Download All Tracks


Info

Backing away from the diversity of OU812, Van Halen turns in some of the most basic, straightforward rock & roll of the band's career on For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge. At times, FUCK recalls the sleek hard rock of Hagar's early-'80s albums. The band is still tight and professional, and Eddie's guitar work remains impressive. The anthemic "Right Now" stands out as the most memorable song of the batch. ~ Stephen Thomas Erlewine, All Music Guide

Yoko Ono sues EMI for $10M

John Lennon's widow accuses UK label giant of "willfully and knowingly underreporting royalties" of sales of her late husband's music.

The Beatles' 27-year battle with EMI over royalties took another turn yesterday as Yoko Ono filed a $10 million lawsuit against the UK label giant and its subsidiary Capitol Records, accusing the companies of cheating her out of royalties from sales of the solo material of her late husband, John Lennon.

Yoko Ono Yoko Ono

In the lawsuit, filed in Manhattan's state Supreme Court, Ono accuses the companies of violating a half-dozen agreements by "willfully and knowingly underreporting royalties" by hiding the "true use and disposition of Lennon's recordings." The lawsuit also charges EMI with "intentionally and systematically rendering dishonest and grossly deficient accounting statements."

The lawsuit follows on the heels of a New York State Supreme Court decision in August to allow a similar lawsuit by Beatles' record company Apple Corps' lawsuit against EMI to proceed. That suit seeks $25 million and accuses the label of fraud and breach of contract.

In the ongoing battle that dates back to 1979 when the legendary band first accused the label of withholding earnings, EMI has already paid Apple Corp two prior settlement payments, one of which was for $35 million. In the current Beatles' case, Apple Corps hopes to reclaim rights to all the master recordings by the band. EMI is appealing that case.

A spokeswoman for EMI/Capitol, Jeanne Meyer, decline to discuss Ono's lawsuit specifically with the Associated Press, saying only, "Artists from time to time request audits of their royalty accounts. Sometimes there are differences of opinion, which is understandable given the complex nature of recording contracts."

Meyer said the contracts are sometimes subject to interpretation "but 99 times out of 100 these things are resolved in an amicable way."

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 0..9

Movies